Visual scale recognition is a fundamental aspect for humans to perceive physical quantities in the real world, and it is crucial for enabling human-like intelligence in multimodal large language models (MLLMs). However, existing benchmarks typically focus on a single type of quantity (e.g., time) or a specific format (e.g., dials), lacking a comprehensive evaluation of scale recognition capabilities. To address these problems, we propose ScaleBench, a visual scale recognition benchmark built using images from COCO, Open Images, and Flickr, designed to comprehensively evaluate the scale recognition capabilities of MLLMs. To ensure high data quality, we develop detailed annotation guidelines and procedures, resulting in a total of 6,574 annotated samples. Based on this benchmark, we evaluate multiple closed-source and open-source MLLMs. Experimental results reveal that the best-performing model achieves only 42.60% accuracy, far lower than the 97.40% of humans. Furthermore, we conduct in-depth experimental analyses and provide future research directions. Our benchmark and implementation codes are available at https://github.com/Sonder-hang/ScaleBench.

Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have achieved remarkable progress in recent years, yet their ability to perform left–right reasoning in mirror contexts—a fundamental element of spatial cognition—remains underexplored. To address this gap, we introduce MirrorQA, a manually constructed benchmark with 5,549 samples, designed to evaluate MLLMs’ capability to distinguish left from right from a subject-centered perspective. MirrorQA is built through a three-stage pipeline (annotation, verification, and final review) to ensure high-quality labeling. Comprehensive evaluations on both open- and closed-source MLLMs show that even the best-performing models achieve only 65.40% accuracy, far below the 99.28% accuracy of humans. These results highlight substantial challenges in current MLLMs when reasoning about left and right, and point to promising directions for future research. MirrorQA and its code are publicly available at anonymous link https://github.com/stargazer-zeno/MirrorQA.

AI Clones aim to simulate an individual’s thoughts and behaviors to enable long-term, personalized interaction, placing stringent demands on memory systems to model experiences, emotions, and opinions over time. Existing memory benchmarks primarily rely on user–agent conversational histories, which are temporally fragmented and insufficient for capturing continuous life trajectories. We introduce CloneMem, a benchmark for evaluating long-term memory in AI Clone scenarios grounded in non-conversational digital traces, including diaries, social media posts, and emails, spanning one to three years. CloneMem adopts a top-down data construction framework to ensure longitudinal coherence and defines tasks that assess an agent’s ability to track evolving personal states. Experiments show that current memory mechanisms struggle in this setting, highlighting open challenges for life-grounded personalized AI. Code and dataset are available at https://github.com/AvatarMemory/CloneMemBench

Existing long-horizon memory benchmarks mostly use multi-turn dialogues or synthetic user histories, which makes retrieval performance an imperfect proxy for person understanding. We present Knowme-Bench, a publicly releasable benchmark built from long-form autobiographical narratives, where actions, context, and inner thoughts provide dense evidence for inferring stable motivations and decision principles. Knowme-Bench reconstructs each narrative into a flashback-aware, time-anchored stream and evaluates models with evidence-linked questions spanning factual recall, subjective state attribution, and principle-level reasoning. Across diverse narrative sources, retrieval-augmented systems mainly improve factual accuracy, while errors persist on temporally grounded explanations and higher-level inferences, highlighting the need for memory mechanisms beyond retrieval.

Current defenses for Large Language Models (LLMs) often suffer from a ”memory gap”: parameter-modifying methods are computationally rigid, while inference-time filters cannot retain or reuse defense knowledge across interactions. To address this, we propose SafetyMem, a novel framework that secures LLMs through a dual-component safety memory system. SafetyMem consists of Semantic Safety Memory (SSM), which consolidates diverse jailbreak attempts into a structured knowledge base of attack patterns, and Episodic Safety Memory (ESM), which maintains an evolving set of procedural rules refined from historical detection failures. Unlike static defenses, SafetyMem allows the model to ”remember” and adapt to emerging adversarial strategies without parameter retraining. To further enhance robustness, we introduce an adversarial memory expansion mechanism that proactively generates challenging variants to solidify these memories. Experiments on standard and stealthy jailbreak benchmarks show that SafetyMem substantially reduces attack success rates while preserving efficiency and interpretability, consistently outperforming state-of-the-art baselines across multiple LLMs.