Abstract
This paper presents ArgRewrite, a corpus of between-draft revisions of argumentative essays. Drafts are manually aligned at the sentence level, and the writer’s purpose for each revision is annotated with categories analogous to those used in argument mining and discourse analysis. The corpus should enable advanced research in writing comparison and revision analysis, as demonstrated via our own studies of student revision behavior and of automatic revision purpose prediction.- Anthology ID:
- P17-1144
- Volume:
- Proceedings of the 55th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers)
- Month:
- July
- Year:
- 2017
- Address:
- Vancouver, Canada
- Editors:
- Regina Barzilay, Min-Yen Kan
- Venue:
- ACL
- SIG:
- Publisher:
- Association for Computational Linguistics
- Note:
- Pages:
- 1568–1578
- Language:
- URL:
- https://preview.aclanthology.org/build-pipeline-with-new-library/P17-1144/
- DOI:
- 10.18653/v1/P17-1144
- Cite (ACL):
- Fan Zhang, Homa B. Hashemi, Rebecca Hwa, and Diane Litman. 2017. A Corpus of Annotated Revisions for Studying Argumentative Writing. In Proceedings of the 55th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), pages 1568–1578, Vancouver, Canada. Association for Computational Linguistics.
- Cite (Informal):
- A Corpus of Annotated Revisions for Studying Argumentative Writing (Zhang et al., ACL 2017)
- PDF:
- https://preview.aclanthology.org/build-pipeline-with-new-library/P17-1144.pdf