Warning: This paper contains examples of stereotypes and biases. Large Language Models (LLMs) exhibit considerable social biases, and various studies have tried to evaluate and mitigate these biases accurately. Previous studies use downstream tasks to examine the degree of social biases for evaluation and mitigation. While the output of LLMs highly depends on prompts, prior works evaluating and mitigating bias have often relied on a limited variety of prompts. In this paper, we investigate the sensitivity of LLMs when changing prompt variations (task instruction, few-shot examples, debias-prompt) by analyzing task performance and social bias of LLMs. Our experimental results reveal that LLM rankings fluctuate across prompts for both task performance and social bias. We also confirmed that the impact of format changes can differ for each bias category. Performance improvement from prompt settings may not result in reduced bias. Moreover, the ambiguity of instances is a common factor in LLM sensitivity to prompts across advanced LLMs. We recommend using diverse prompts, as in this study, to compare the effects of prompts on social bias in LLMs.

While large language models (LLMs) excel at machine translation (MT), the impact of how LLMs utilize different forms of contextual information on discourse-level phenomena remains underexplored. We systematically investigate how different forms of context such as prior source sentences, models’ generated hypotheses, and reference translations influence standard MT metrics and specific discourse phenomena (formality, pronoun selection, and lexical cohesion). Evaluating multiple LLMs across multiple domains and language pairs, our findings consistently show that context boosts both translation and discourse-specific performance. Notably, the context strategy of combining source text with the model’s own prior hypotheses effectively improves discourse consistency without gold references, demonstrating effective use of model’s own imperfect generations as diverse contextual cues.

For extracting meaningful topics from texts, their structures should be considered properly. In this paper, we aim to analyze structured time-series documents such as a collection of news articles and a series of scientific papers, wherein topics evolve along time depending on multiple topics in the past and are also related to each other at each time. To this end, we propose a dynamic and static topic model, which simultaneously considers the dynamic structures of the temporal topic evolution and the static structures of the topic hierarchy at each time. We show the results of experiments on collections of scientific papers, in which the proposed method outperformed conventional models. Moreover, we show an example of extracted topic structures, which we found helpful for analyzing research activities.