This paper presents an approach to automated text simplification for CEFR A2 and B1 levels using large language models and prompt engineering. We evaluate seven models across three prompting strategies short, descriptive, and descriptive with examples. A two-round evaluation system using LLM-as-a-Judge and traditional metrics for text simplification determines optimal model-prompt combinations for final submissions. Results demonstrate that descriptive prompts consistently outperform other strategies across all models, achieving 46-65% of first-place rankings. Qwen3 shows superior performance for A2-level simplification, while B1-level results are more balanced across models. The LLM-as-a-Judge evaluation method shows strong alignment with traditional metrics while providing enhanced explainability.