Bankruptcies in America: Waiting for Armageddon | The Economist
Log in
Register
My account
Subscribe
Digital & mobile
Newsletters
RSS
Jobs
Help
Friday November 18th 2011
Search this site:
World politics
United States
US Elections 2012
Britain
Europe
Asia
Americas
Middle East & Africa
Business & finance
Economics
All Economics
Economics by invitation
Markets & data
Economics A-Z
Science & technology
All Science & technology
Technology Quarterly
Culture
All Culture
More Intelligent Life
The Economist Quiz
Blogs
Latest blog posts
Eastern approaches
Americas view
Free exchange
Babbage
Game theory
Bagehot's notebook
Gulliver
Banyan
Johnson
Baobab
Leviathan
Blighty
Lexington's notebook
Buttonwood's notebook
Multimedia
Charlemagne's notebook
Newsbook
Clausewitz
Prospero
Daily chart
Schumpeter
Democracy in America
The World in 2012
Debate & discuss
Economist debates
Economics by invitation
Ideas arena
Letters to the editor
Multimedia
All multimedia
The Economist audio edition
Print edition
Current issue
Previous issues
Special reports
Politics this week
Business this week
All Business & finance
Which MBA?
Bankruptcies in America
Waiting for Armageddon
The recent rise in corporate bankruptcies in America may well be a sign of much worse to come
Mar 27th 2008 | new york | from the print edition
Tweet
CAPITALISM without bankruptcy, it is said, is like Christianity without hell. With recession looming, the air in America's bankruptcy courts is thick with brimstone and the coals are being heated in readiness for the many sad souls whose sin was to borrow too much. After several heavenly years, in which bankruptcies fell to record lows, going bust is back. How bad will things get?
If the debt markets are to be believed, companies could be in at least as much trouble as they were in the previous two downturns, in the early 1990s and at the start of this decade, after the dotcom bubble burst. A leading indicator is the spread between yields on speculative ¡°junk¡± bonds and American Treasury bonds. A year ago, the spread was only about 280 basis points; the long-term average is around 500 points. This month the spread exceeded 800 points for the first time since March 2003, reaching 862 on March 17th.
The bankruptcy rate (in the previous 12 months) for high-yielding bonds has so far edged only modestly higher, to 1.28% from a record low of 0.87% in November. But most forecasters expect it to rise sharply over the coming months. For instance, Moody's, a ratings agency, predicts that the default rate will rise to 5.4% by the end of this year, mostly due to problems in America. (Moody's also expects a rise in European bankruptcies this year, but only to 3.4%, thanks to lower levels of borrowing and less exposure to economic weakness.)
In this section
?Waiting for Armageddon
Now what?
Pile up
Another inspector calls
The old ball game
Fraternity
From quantity to quality
At the sweet spot
This is your captain speaking
ReprintsRelated items
Banking: The regulators are comingMar 27th 2008
Bear Stearns: No picnicMar 27th 2008
Related topics
Bond markets
Fixed-income securities
Corporate bankruptcies
Moody's
United States
That is a relatively optimistic prediction, for it would merely return the bankruptcy rate close to its long-term average after an abnormally trouble-free period, and it assumes only a mild recession in America. But if there is a severe recession, the default rate ¡°could go to double figures,¡± admits Kenneth Emery, head of corporate-default research at Moody's.
Other forecasters are much gloomier. FridsonVision, a research firm, publishes a default-rate predictor based on the percentage of bonds trading with a spread of at least 1,000 basis points. On March 19th this was forecasting a default rate on high-yielding American corporate bonds of 8.55% by the end of February 2009, compared with Moody's forecast for American bonds of 6.8% for that date.
Martin Fridson, the firm's founder, admits this forecast is risky, because it relies on prices set in a market that has been hit by the liquidity crisis. Indeed, some contrarians believe that today's corporate-bond spreads say more about the shaky health of the financial markets than they do about the condition of corporate borrowers. As liquidity returns, they predict, corporate-bond prices will soar, making this the buying opportunity of a lifetime.
Mr Fridson concedes that the difference between corporate-bond spreads and actual default rates is unusual and hard to explain: on the previous occasions when spreads have exceeded 800 points, the default rate was already 9.43% in 1990 and 5.44% in 2000. That said, the huge amounts of ¡°covenant lite¡± debt issued in the credit boom of 2005-07, which gives lenders much less power to demand their money back than in the past, may have delayed the moment of default for many underperforming firms. So FridsonVision looked at the ten firms in which spreads exceeded 1,000 points by the smallest amounts. If these were merely victims of irrational pessimism in the market, they ought to be in relatively good shape. In fact, the analysts found plenty of reasons to worry. The companies included household names such as Beazer Homes, Ford and Rite Aid, all of which are ¡°exhibiting classically distressed behaviour of downsizing amid recurring losses.¡±
A look at the firms with distressed debt shows that problems are rapidly moving beyond the long-term sick (airlines, cars) and the industries immediately affected by the crisis (home builders, mortgage lenders, monoline insurers). Craig Dean of AEG Partners, a restructuring-advisory firm, says he is now seeing troubled companies in retailing, restaurants, manufacturing and food processing.
As defaults rise, the new rules governing Chapter 11 of America's bankruptcy code will face their first test. Long admired as the world's best system for allowing corporate liabilities to be restructured while giving firms a decent chance of staying in business, the rules were tightened in 2005 to deter firms from staying in Chapter 11 too long and to stop the managers of bankrupt firms from paying themselves too much. One result may be that firms will try to restructure without going into Chapter 11, or at least do much more preparation before they enter it, says Mr Dean.
But perhaps the biggest difference this time will be the effects of the huge market for credit derivatives and other credit-related securities, which often dwarf the amount of debt that a firm has issued, says Henry Owsley of Gordion, another restructuring adviser. The interaction between underlying debt and credit derivatives will complicate bankruptcy and near-bankruptcy no end, he says.
A big concern for company bosses will be the role of speculative investors, especially hedge funds. They can use derivatives to pursue complex strategies that may not be in the best interests of the firm that has issued the underlying debt, says Henry Hu, a law professor at the University of Texas, Austin. In a bankruptcy, a hedge fund could use the voting rights attached to different securities to maximise the overall value of its holdings in the firm at the expense of other investors.
Imagine, for instance, a hedge fund that owns debt secured against a company asset. It may prefer to force the firm into liquidation in order to win that asset rather than engage in a restructuring negotiation that will keep the firm alive. Meanwhile, it can boost its returns by short selling its unsecured debt and its equity. Or suppose that a hedge fund owns credit-default swaps as well as a firm's debt. If the fund makes enough money from the pay-out of the credit-default swaps, it may prefer to use the voting rights on its debt to ensure that the firm goes bust rather than negotiate a way to avoid bankruptcy.
So far there is little hard evidence that hedge funds are doing this. But in recent papers written with his colleague Bernard Black, Mr Hu reports credible rumours and other evidence of what they have dubbed ¡°debt decoupling¡±, both in and outside of bankruptcy. Such activity is only likely to increase. ¡°When there are more restructurings and bankruptcies, there is a lot more potential for mischief,¡± says Mr Hu.
from the print edition | Business
Recommend
38
Tweet
Submit to reddit
View all comments (11)
Related items
TOPIC: Bond markets ?
Buttonwood: Two tiers, too complex
Euro bonds: The tricky path toward greater fiscal integration
The euro and its troubles: Summit for nothing
TOPIC: Fixed-income securities ?
Contagion: What can Europe learn from the Lehman collapse?
Financing Germany¡¯s Mittelstand: A crisis-born fledgling
The euro deal: No big bazooka
TOPIC: Corporate bankruptcies ?
The Catholic church: Chapter 11, verse 8
EMF roundtable: EMF roundtable: A political non-starter
Detroit's blues: Roadkill
TOPIC: Moody's ?
Business this week
Europe's debt crisis: Spot the pattern
The Fed, the budget and the economy: Policy fatigue
More related topics:
United States
Investment funds
Financial markets
Want more? Subscribe to The Economist and get the week's most relevant news and analysis.
Comment (11)
Print
E-mail
Reprints & permissions
Advertisement
Most commented
Most recommended
Most commented
This week's caption competition: Caption competition 16
China¡¯s restive Tibetan regions: No mercy
The future of the EU: Two-speed Europe, or two Europes?
Israel squares up to Iran: That¡¯s right, Iceman. I am dangerous
The end of Berlusconi: Hallelujah
Hungary's politics: Orb¨¢n and the wind from the east
Foreign aid: Why Ron Paul is wrong
Charlemagne: Europe against the people?
Europe¡¯s big two: The Nico and Angela show
Free-trade agreements: Opening up the Pacific
Over the past five days
Most recommended
South Korea¡¯s economy: What do you do when you reach the top?
Staring into the abyss
Understanding the euro crisis: It's not about Berlusconi
The end of Berlusconi: Hallelujah
Free-trade agreements: Opening up the Pacific
China¡¯s restive Tibetan regions: No mercy
Romney's conservatisms: Conservatism comes in many flavours
Breaking up the euro: How it could happen; why it would be horrible
Italy and the euro zone: That¡¯s all, folks
Technocrats and democracy: Have PhD, will govern
Over the past seven days
Advertisement
Latest blog posts - All times are GMT
Still faster than light
From Babbage - 1 hrs 15 mins ago
Rising German ambitions for treaty-change pile the pressure on David Cameron
From Bagehot's notebook - 3 hrs 50 mins ago
Scrap the tax, Mr Osborne
From Gulliver - November 18th, 11:03
Fived things about willpower
From Prospero - November 18th, 10:40
Online pecking order
From Babbage - November 18th, 10:31
Difference Engine: Ho, ho, ho...
From Babbage - November 18th, 8:08
Give-and-take all round
From Banyan - November 18th, 7:46 More from our blogs ?
Products & events
Stay informed today and every day
Subscribe to The Economist's free e-mail newsletters and alerts.
Get e-mail newsletters
Subscribe to The Economist's latest article postings on Twitter
Follow The Economist on Twitter
See a selection of The Economist's articles, events, topical videos and debates on Facebook.
Follow The Economist on Facebook
Advertisement
Classified ads
About The Economist online
About The Economist
Media directory
Staff books
Career opportunities
Contact us
Subscribe
[+] Site Feedback
Copyright ? The Economist Newspaper Limited 2011. All rights reserved.
Advertising info
Legal disclaimer
Accessibility
Privacy policy
Terms of use
Help
