Answer to Question 1-1
The challenges in modelling the perception of text can be broadly categorized as follows:

1. **Visual Representation and Interpretation**: One challenge is to accurately model how humans visually perceive and interpret text, which involves understanding the impact of font type, size, color, and layout on readability and comprehension. For example, when a text has an unusual or complex font style, it might be difficult for a model to comprehend its content as humans do, especially if the characters are not easily recognizable or have low contrast with the background.

2. **Contextual Understanding**: Another challenge is capturing the context in which text is perceived, including both linguistic (e.g., sarcasm, irony) and situational (e.g., cultural references, temporal context) aspects. An example of this is understanding idiomatic expressions or colloquial language, where a phrase like "break a leg" doesn't mean to physically harm someone but rather to wish them good luck. Modelling this requires the ability to understand the underlying meaning that goes beyond the literal interpretation of words.

These challenges require models to integrate both visual and contextual information effectively to replicate human perception of text accurately.





****************************************************************************************
****************************************************************************************




Answer to Question 1-2
a. The assumption of the N-gram language model is that the probability of a word depends only on its immediate context, which consists of the previous N-1 words. In other words, it assumes that the occurrence of a word can be predicted given the recent history of the preceding words.

b. For the tri-gram (3-gram) language model, we would calculate the probability of each word based on the previous two words. The sentence "This is the exam of Advanced AI" can be broken down into trigrams:

1. P("exam" | "is", "the")
2. P("of" | "exam", "Advanced")
3. P("Advanced" | "of", "exam")
4. P("AI" | "Advanced", "of")

Assuming we have the necessary probabilities from a trained model, these would be multiplied together to get the overall probability of the sentence:

P(sentence) = P("This") * P("is" | "This") * P("the" | "This", "is") * P("exam" | "is", "the") * P("of" | "exam", "Advanced") * P("Advanced" | "of", "exam") * P("AI" | "Advanced", "of")

Note that the actual numerical probabilities would be provided by the trained model and are not given in this question.





****************************************************************************************
****************************************************************************************




Answer to Question 1-3
a. The BPE vocabulary building process for a size of 15 from the sentences "I study in KIT. I like AI and NLP." would involve the following steps:

1. **Lowercase and remove punctuation**: Convert all letters to lowercase and remove any punctuation, resulting in the string: "i study in kit i like ai and nlp".
2. **Split into words**: Split the string into individual words: ["i", "study", "in", "kit", "i", "like", "ai", "and", "nlp"].
3. **Initialize vocabulary**: Start with an empty vocabulary, which will eventually contain 15 most frequent pairs of characters (or single characters if they haven't been merged yet).
4. **Count character pairs**: For each word, count the frequency of all possible pairs of characters. If a pair is not seen before, its count is zero.
5. **Merge most frequent pair**: Merge the two characters that form the most frequent pair into a new token and update the vocabulary. Repeat this process until the vocabulary size reaches 15.

The final BPE vocabulary (assuming no ties in frequency) might look like this:

- /w
- i/
- st/
- tu/
- dy/
- in/
- k/
- it/
- /
- l/
- ik/
- ke/
- a/
- n/
- lp/

b. Using the generated BPE vocabulary, tokenize the sentence "I like KIT." would result in:

- "i"
- /w
- li/
- ik/
- e/
- /w
- k/
- it/
- /w





****************************************************************************************
****************************************************************************************




Answer to Question 1-4
a. The BILOU (Begin, Inside, Outside, Last, Unit) labeling scheme is used to tag each word in a sequence with its role in identifying a named entity. Here's the label sequence for the given sentence:

When: O
I: O
study: O
at: O
Karlsruhe: B-University
Institute: I-University
of: I-University
Technology: L-University
, : O
my: O
favorite: O
course: B-Course
was: O
Advanced: B-Course
Artificial: I-Course
Intelligence: L-Course
organized: O
by: O
ISL: B-Lab
, : O
AI4LT: B-Lab
, : O
and: O
H2T: B-Lab
labs: O

b. The sequence labeling model would have five output classes corresponding to BILOU tags: B (beginning of a named entity), I (inside a named entity), L (last of a named entity), U (single-unit named entity), and O (outside a named entity).





****************************************************************************************
****************************************************************************************




Answer to Question 2-1
a. For the CBOW model, a training sample would be: Context words - ["Human", "than"], Target word - "smarter". For the Skip-gram model, a training sample would be: Context word - "smarter", Target word - "human"; another sample could be: Context word - "language", Target word - "model".

b. The challenge faced by the skip-gram model is that it struggles to generate meaningful representations for infrequent words (or out-of-vocabulary words) because there are fewer occurrences to learn from. A solution to this is using subword information, like WordPiece or Byte Pair Encoding, which breaks down infrequent words into smaller units. For the sentence "Human is smarter than large language model", if "large" is an infrequent word, it could be broken down into "larg" and "e". This way, the model can learn representations for these subwords even if the whole word doesn't appear frequently.





****************************************************************************************
****************************************************************************************




Answer to Question 2-2
a. The problem with this model is that it lacks the context-awareness and sequence modeling capabilities of the Transformer's encoder. In the original Transformer, the encoder uses self-attention mechanisms to understand the relationships between words in a sentence, capturing contextual information. By replacing the encoder with word embeddings, the decoder won't have access to these learned contextual representations, which are crucial for accurate translation, especially for languages with complex syntactic structures or idiomatic expressions.

b. An example of two sentences where one will definitely be translated incorrectly could be:

Original sentences:
1. "She is happy because she saw him."
2. "He saw her, so she is happy."

In the proposed model without a proper encoder, the translation might fail to capture the temporal relationship between the events in the sentences. For instance, it might translate both sentences as if the happiness always follows the sight (e.g., "She is happy because he saw her" and "He saw her, so she became happy"). The correct translation should reflect the different order of events in each sentence, which requires understanding the context and relationships between words, a capability lost without the Transformer's encoder.





****************************************************************************************
****************************************************************************************




Answer to Question 2-3
a) The strategy implemented in the feature encoder of wav2vec2.0 to encourage learning contextualized representations is called "masking". This involves randomly selecting and masking (or removing) some percentage of the feature vectors from the output sequence Z, forcing the model to learn to predict the missing information based on the surrounding context. This strategy relates to the contrastive loss because during pre-training, the model tries to minimize the distance between the masked representations in Z and their corresponding context representations C, which are generated without access to the masked information. The contrastive loss essentially measures how well the model can recover the masked elements from the context encoding.

b) Besides the contrastive loss, another loss function involved in the pre-training objective of wav2vec2.0 is the "classification loss" or "logistic regression loss". This loss is computed by training a linear classifier on top of the quantized representations Q to predict the original masked positions in Z. The necessity of this loss lies in the fact that it provides an additional supervisory signal for learning discriminative features, as the model needs to classify the correct segments among all possible choices. It also helps to learn a better representation space where similar speech sounds are closer and dissimilar ones are farther apart.





****************************************************************************************
****************************************************************************************




Answer to Question 3-1
I would agree with my friend. A Bidirectional model is indeed better than a Unidirectional model for text generation in this context. The reason lies in the nature of the task: generating image descriptions. In a bidirectional model, the sequence is processed both forward and backward, allowing the model to consider the entire input sequence when generating each output token. This provides more context and information for predicting the next word in the description.

In contrast, a unidirectional model can only use the previously generated tokens as context, which might not be sufficient to capture the full essence of the image, especially if some important details are mentioned later in the description. The bidirectional model's ability to consider the entire sequence at once is beneficial for generating coherent and informative descriptions that accurately reflect the content of the image.





****************************************************************************************
****************************************************************************************




Answer to Question 3-2
To handle out-of-vocabulary (OOV) words in a machine translation model, one approach is to use subword or word-piece tokenization. This technique breaks down unknown or infrequent words into smaller meaningful units called subwords. For example, an OOV word "embarrassment" could be represented as ["emb", "arrass", "ment"]. By doing this, the model can still learn representations for unseen words based on their constituent subwords.

Potential problem: One potential issue with using subword tokenization is that it may introduce more tokens to the vocabulary, which increases the complexity of the model. The decoder needs to generate longer sequences and might require a larger capacity to handle these additional subwords effectively. This could lead to slower training times and potentially less optimal translations if the model struggles to learn representations for the numerous combinations of subwords.





****************************************************************************************
****************************************************************************************




Answer to Question 3-3
a. Multi-head self-attention in transformers is a way to capture dependencies from different representation subspaces. It divides the input into multiple attention heads, each learning to attend to different patterns or relationships. Each head computes its own attention weights, and their results are concatenated and linearly transformed, allowing the model to learn diverse contextual information.

b. On the solution sheet's self-attention weight matrix in a decoder, we should mask out the weights corresponding to future positions since the decoder should not have access to future information for autoregressive modeling. This is typically done by placing an 'X' on the upper triangular part of the matrix (excluding the diagonal) as it represents the dependencies from the current position to the later positions in the sequence.





****************************************************************************************
****************************************************************************************




Answer to Question 3-4
a. The confusion matrix is a table that summarizes the performance of a classification model by comparing the predicted labels with the actual labels. Here's how you can fill in the confusion matrix for a binary classification problem:

|              | Predicted Positive | Predicted Negative |
|--------------|--------------------|--------------------|
| Actual Positive | TP (True Positive)  | FN (False Negative) |
| Actual Negative | FP (False Positive) | TN (True Negative)  |

b. Precision is the proportion of true positive predictions among all positive predictions, while Recall is the proportion of true positive predictions among all actual positive cases. The equations are:

Precision = TP / (TP + FP)
Recall = TP / (TP + FN)

c. Using only precision can introduce bias when there are different costs associated with false positives and false negatives. For example, in a spam email filter, if precision is the sole metric, the model might be biased towards classifying more emails as spam to avoid false positives (non-spam emails classified as spam), which could result in users missing important legitimate emails.

Using only recall can introduce bias when the focus is on detecting all positive cases, regardless of the number of false positives. For instance, in a disease screening test, if recall is prioritized, the model might have a high rate of false positives (healthy people classified as having the disease), leading to unnecessary worry and additional testing for a large number of individuals.





****************************************************************************************
****************************************************************************************




Answer to Question 4-1
To determine the continuous convolution D-D-D graphically, we need to follow these steps:

1. Shift $h(t)$ by an amount $t'$ along the time axis.
2. Reflect the shifted version of $h(t)$ about the vertical axis (this is the convolution operation).
3. Integrate the product of $f(t)$ and the reflected, shifted $h(t)$ over the interval from $-\infty$ to $t$.

Given that $f(t) = g * h(t)$, we start with the function $g(t)$ and convolve it with $h(t)$. However, no specific functions for $g(t)$ or $h(t)$ are provided in this question. To proceed, I would need more information about these functions.

The figure mentioned is "imgs/graph.png", but as an AI text-based model, I cannot directly view or analyze images. If the image shows the graphs of $f(t)$, $g(t)$, and $h(t)$ along with important points marked, please describe the graph in detail so that I can help you determine the convolution.

Assuming the functions are not provided, here's a general description of how to represent the convolution graphically:

- Plot $g(t)$ as a curve on the time-axis.
- Plot $h(t)$ as another curve on the same axis.
- Reflect $h(t)$ about the vertical axis to get $h(-t)$.
- Shift this reflected curve along the time-axis by an amount $t'$, resulting in $h(-(t-t'))$.
- The convolution is represented by the area under the product of $f(t)$ and $h(-(t-t'))$ from $-\infty$ to $t$.

If you can provide more details about the functions or the figure, I would be able to give a more specific answer.





****************************************************************************************
****************************************************************************************




Answer to Question 4-2
To determine the discrete convolution \( u \* v \) of the two given functions, we can follow these steps:

1. Define the functions:
   - \( u[t] = \{1, 3, 0.5, 1, 0.5, 0, \ldots\} \)
   - \( v[t] = \{1, 2, 3, 0, \ldots\} \)

2. Perform the convolution by sliding \( v \) over \( u \) and multiplying overlapping values:
   For each time \( t \), we calculate the convolution sum as follows:

   \[ (u \* v)[t] = \sum_{k=-\infty}^{\infty} u[k] \cdot v[t-k] \]

3. Since both functions are zero for negative indices, we can start at \( k=0 \) and go up to the maximum index where either function is non-zero.

   For \( t=0 \):
   \[ (u \* v)[0] = 1 \cdot 1 + 3 \cdot 0 + 0.5 \cdot 2 + 1 \cdot 0 + 0.5 \cdot 0 + 0 \cdot (-1) = 1 + 0 + 1 + 0 + 0 + 0 = 2 \]

   For \( t=1 \):
   \[ (u \* v)[1] = 1 \cdot 0 + 3 \cdot 1 + 0.5 \cdot 2 + 1 \cdot 3 + 0.5 \cdot 0 + 0 \cdot (-2) = 0 + 3 + 1 + 3 + 0 + 0 = 7 \]

   For \( t=2 \):
   \[ (u \* v)[2] = 1 \cdot 0 + 3 \cdot 0 + 0.5 \cdot 1 + 1 \cdot 2 + 0.5 \cdot 3 + 0 \cdot (-3) = 0 + 0 + 0.5 + 2 + 1.5 + 0 = 4 \]

   For \( t=3 \):
   \[ (u \* v)[3] = 1 \cdot 0 + 3 \cdot 0 + 0.5 \cdot 0 + 1 \cdot 3 + 0.5 \cdot 2 + 0 \cdot (-4) = 0 + 0 + 0 + 3 + 1 + 0 = 4 \]

   For \( t=4 \):
   \[ (u \* v)[4] = 1 \cdot 0 + 3 \cdot 0 + 0.5 \cdot 0 + 1 \cdot 0 + 0.5 \cdot 3 + 0 \cdot (-5) = 0 + 0 + 0 + 0 + 1.5 + 0 = 1.5 \]

   For \( t=5 \):
   \[ (u \* v)[5] = 1 \cdot 0 + 3 \cdot 0 + 0.5 \cdot 0 + 1 \cdot 0 + 0.5 \cdot 0 + 0 \cdot (-6) = 0 + 0 + 0 + 0 + 0 + 0 = 0 \]

   Since both functions are zero for \( t > 5 \), the convolution is also zero for those indices.

The discrete convolution \( u \* v \) can be represented as:

\[ (u \* v)[t] = \{2, 7, 4, 4, 1.5, 0, \ldots\} \]

We can visualize this by plotting the original functions and their convolution on a graph with time on the x-axis and values on the y-axis. The convolution would be a combination of the peaks from both \( u \) and \( v \), shifted and combined according to the calculation above.





****************************************************************************************
****************************************************************************************




Answer to Question 4-3
a) The sampling theorem, also known as Nyquist-Shannon Sampling Theorem, states that a continuous-time signal can be perfectly reconstructed from its discrete-time samples if the sampling rate is at least twice the highest frequency component (the Nyquist rate) present in the original signal.

b) When the sampling theorem is not fulfilled, a phenomenon called aliasing occurs. Aliasing happens when high-frequency components in the signal are incorrectly represented as lower frequencies in the sampled version of the signal, leading to distortion and loss of information.

c) To illustrate this, imagine a sketch of a simple square wave function f(t) with a fundamental frequency F. If the sampling rate is less than 2F (i.e., not meeting the Nyquist criterion), the reconstructed signal will have folded or aliased versions of the original high-frequency components. In the time domain, this would appear as a distorted version of the original square wave, where the high-frequency edges are rounded off and might even appear as a different waveform with lower frequency components. The sketch would show the original square wave alongside its aliased representation when undersampled, emphasizing the difference in shape and frequency content.





****************************************************************************************
****************************************************************************************




Answer to Question 4-4
To calculate the Word Error Rate (WER), we first need to align the words in the reference and hypothesis sentences, then count the number of insertions, deletions, and substitutions. Here's how the alignment would look:

REF: I need to book a flight to New York for next week
HYP: I need to cook light in Newark four next weeks

1. "book" is replaced with "cook"
2. "flight" is deleted
3. "to" is deleted
4. "New York" is replaced with "light"
5. "in" is inserted
6. "Newark" is inserted
7. "for" is deleted
8. "four" is inserted
9. "next weeks" is inserted (since "week" is correct but the plural form is not)

So, there are 9 errors in total (3 substitutions, 4 deletions, and 2 insertions). The WER is calculated as follows:

WER = (number of errors) / (total number of words in both reference and hypothesis)
WER = 9 / (10 + 11)   (since there are 10 words in the REF and 11 in the HYP)

Now, calculate the accuracy ACC:

ACC = 1 - WER
ACC = 1 - (9 / 21)
ACC ≈ 0.5714

Rounded to a percentage:
ACC ≈ 57%

So, the recognition accuracy is approximately 57%.





****************************************************************************************
****************************************************************************************




Answer to Question 5-1
One image segmentation method that can be used to detect each object instance in the scene is Mask R-CNN. This method works by using a convolutional neural network (CNN) architecture, which combines region proposal networks (RPNs) and mask prediction heads.

Here's how it operates:

1. **Region Proposal Network (RPN):** The RPN scans the input image and proposes potential object regions of interest (RoIs). It does this by generating a set of bounding boxes around areas that might contain objects, using anchor boxes at different scales and aspect ratios to cover various object sizes.

2. **Feature Extraction:** The RoIs are then passed through a feature extraction layer, which is typically a shared convolutional backbone (e.g., ResNet). This extracts high-level features for each proposed region.

3. **Classification and Regression:** These extracted features are used for two tasks: (a) classifying whether the RoI contains an object or not (e.g., water bottle, cup, or background), and (b) refining the bounding box coordinates to better fit the object.

4. **Mask Prediction Head:** For each RoI classified as containing an object, a separate mask prediction head is used. This head generates a segmentation mask for each instance, predicting pixel-wise whether each pixel belongs to the object or not.

5. **Instance Segmentation:** The final step combines the bounding box refinements and segmentation masks to provide instance-level segmentation. Each object instance is assigned a unique identifier, allowing multiple instances of the same object class (e.g., two water bottles) to be distinguished.

Mask R-CNN is particularly useful for this scenario because it not only segments objects but also provides accurate instance-level information, which is crucial for learning pouring actions where differentiating between multiple objects is important.





****************************************************************************************
****************************************************************************************




Answer to Question 5-2
The perturbation force term in the Dynamic Movement Primitives (DMPs) formulation is needed for several reasons:

1. **Adaptability**: DMPs are designed to be adaptable to changing environmental conditions or unexpected disturbances during the execution of a movement. The perturbation force allows the robot to adjust its trajectory in response to these changes, ensuring that it can still complete the task effectively.

2. **Learning from Demonstrations**: When learning from human demonstrations, there might be variations in how people perform the same action (e.g., pouring water). The perturbation force term helps the DMP model capture this variability and generalize across different demonstration styles.

3. **Goal-Driven Behavior**: DMPs are goal-oriented, meaning they focus on reaching a specific endpoint or target. The perturbation force can be used to steer the motion towards the desired goal more directly, especially when the initial trajectory is not perfectly aligned with the target.

4. **Smoothness and Naturalness**: The perturbation force contributes to generating smooth and natural movements by fine-tuning the trajectory during execution. This is important for tasks like pouring water, where a smooth and controlled motion is crucial.

5. **Integration with other control signals**: DMPs can be combined with other control signals or sensory feedback, and the perturbation force term allows for seamless integration of these additional inputs to modify the movement as needed.

In summary, the perturbation force in DMPs enables adaptability, learning from variations in demonstrations, goal-directed behavior, smooth motion, and integration with other control signals, making it a crucial component for learning and executing tasks like pouring water.





****************************************************************************************
****************************************************************************************




Answer to Question 5-3
The locally weighted regression (LWR) with a radial basis function (RBF) can be expressed as:

\[ f(x) = \sum_{i=1}^{N} w_i \phi(\|x - x_i\|; \sigma) \]

where:
- \( N \) is the number of demonstration data points.
- \( x \) is a point in the input space where we want to predict the force.
- \( x_i \) are the demonstration data points in the input space.
- \( w_i \) are the weights assigned to each demonstration point, which are typically determined by a distance-based weighting function such as:
\[ w_i = \frac{1}{(1 + \|x - x_i\|^2 / \sigma^2)} \]
where \( \sigma \) is a smoothing parameter that controls the influence of nearby points.
- \( \phi(\|x - x_i\|; \sigma) \) is the RBF kernel, which is usually a Gaussian function:
\[ \phi(d; \sigma) = e^{(-\frac{d^2}{2\sigma^2})} \]
where \( d \) is the Euclidean distance between \( x \) and \( x_i \).

In this context, the force term we're approximating is the pouring water action, and the LWR with RBF is used to model how the perturbation force changes depending on the robot's configuration (represented by \( x \)). The variables in the equation represent the input space coordinates, weights, kernel function, and smoothing parameter. By using this formulation, the robot can learn a continuous and smooth representation of the pouring action based on the human demonstrations.





****************************************************************************************
****************************************************************************************




Answer to Question 5-4
A Dynamic Movement Primitives (DMP) model is a type of algorithm used in robotics to learn and reproduce complex movements. It is composed of a set of basis functions that can be adapted based on demonstrated trajectories.

1. **Can a DMP 1 for a specific motion be learned from five human demonstrations?**
   Yes, a DMP 1 for a specific motion like pouring water can be learned from five human demonstrations. Each demonstration provides an example trajectory of the task, which can be used to initialize and adapt the basis functions in the DMP model. By combining the information from multiple demonstrations, the robot can learn a more robust and representative pattern of the action.

2. **Explanation:**
   - **Data Collection:** The RGB-D videos provide both visual (RGB) and depth (D) information about the human demonstrations, which can be used to extract the relevant motion data.
   - **Feature Extraction:** Key points or features related to the pouring motion, such as the start and end positions of the pouring action, can be identified from each demonstration.
   - **Basis Functions Initialization:** The initial trajectory is often generated by averaging the demonstrated trajectories, which forms the starting point for the DMP.
   - **Adaptation and Learning:** Using a learning algorithm (e.g., online learning), the robot adjusts the weights of the basis functions to match the demonstrated motion. Since there are five demonstrations, the model can be made more robust by considering the commonalities and variations across them.
   - **Testing and Reproduction:** Once learned, the DMP can be used to reproduce the pouring motion based on the adapted basis functions.

In summary, a DMP can effectively learn from multiple human demonstrations to capture the essential features of a task like pouring water. The more demonstrations provided, the better the robot can generalize and adapt its movement to different situations.





****************************************************************************************
****************************************************************************************




Answer to Question 5-5
For modeling the demonstrated pouring action with an obstacle avoidance via-point, a suitable movement primitive is a Dynamic Movement Primitive (DMPs). DMPs are a type of movement representation that can be easily adapted for new goals or constraints. In this case, they can effectively model the pouring motion while incorporating the via-point to avoid the obstacle.

Here's why DMPs would be a good choice:

1. **Flexibility**: DMPs can represent a wide range of complex movements with high-dimensional data such as RGB-D videos.
2. **Generalization**: They allow for generalizing the demonstrated trajectories and can adapt to new goals, like pouring into a different container or avoiding an obstacle.
3. **Adaptability**: By introducing a via-point in the DMP formulation, the robot can learn to modify its trajectory to avoid the obstacle while still maintaining the essential characteristics of the pouring motion.
4. **Control flexibility**: DMPs can be combined with other control strategies (e.g., impedance control) for better interaction with the environment during the pouring action.
5. **Efficiency**: DMPs are computationally efficient and can be easily implemented on robotic systems.

In summary, DMPs would be a suitable choice because they offer flexibility in representing complex movements, can generalize across different goals or constraints, and allow for obstacle avoidance through the introduction of via-points.





****************************************************************************************
****************************************************************************************




Answer to Question 5-6
Cognitivist cognitive architectures are based on the idea that mental processes can be modeled using algorithms and symbolic representations, resembling how human cognition is thought to work. They emphasize the importance of explicit knowledge representation and rule-based processing. Examples include ACT-R and SOAR.

Emergent cognitive architectures, on the other hand, focus on self-organizing systems and the emergence of intelligent behavior from simple interactions between components. These architectures often incorporate neural networks or other forms of connectionism, where cognition arises from the collective dynamics of interconnected units. Examples include Connectionist Networks and SPAUN (Spiking Neural Network Architecture).

A hybrid cognitive architecture combines elements of both cognitivist and emergent approaches. It integrates symbolic processing with connectionist models to capture both explicit knowledge representation and the benefits of parallel distributed processing. An example of a hybrid architecture is LIDA (Learning, Intelligent Distribution Agent), which uses both a neural network and a symbolic system to model cognitive processes.

In summary:
1. Cognitivist architectures emphasize symbolic representations and rule-based processing.
2. Emergent architectures focus on self-organizing systems where intelligent behavior emerges from component interactions.
3. Hybrid architectures combine aspects of both cognitivist and emergent models, integrating symbolic processing with connectionist components.





****************************************************************************************
****************************************************************************************




Answer to Question 5-7
a) The forgetting mechanism given by $\\alpha_i(t)$ is a time-based decay method. This is because the activation level of an item in memory decays over time, as indicated by the sum over past recall or creation events weighted by a normal distribution with a mean at the event's time and a standard deviation $d$. The parameter $\beta_i$ represents the initial strength or importance of the item $i$, which influences how quickly its activation level decays. The parameter $d$ is related to discriminability, as it determines the spread of the normal distribution; a smaller $d$ would lead to more distinct peaks for each recall event, while a larger $d$ would cause activations from different events to blend together more.

b) To calculate the activation levels at $t=3$, we use the given information about recall and creation times. Since $\beta_{i_1} = \beta_{i_2} = \beta_{i_3}$, let's denote this common value as $\beta$. The equations for calculating the activation levels are:

$$\alpha_{i_1}(t=3) = \beta \cdot (r_{i_1,0} + r_{i_1,3}) \cdot \mathcal{N}(t=0) + \mathcal{N}(t=3)$$
$$\alpha_{i_2}(t=3) = \beta \cdot (r_{i_2,0} + r_{i_2,2}) \cdot \mathcal{N}(t=0) + \mathcal{N}(t=2)$$
$$\alpha_{i_3}(t=3) = \beta \cdot r_{i_3,3} \cdot \mathcal{N}(t=3)$$

Here, $r_{i_1,0}$ and $r_{i_2,0}$ are 0 because the items were not recalled or created at time 0. $r_{i_1,3}$, $r_{i_2,2}$, and $r_{i_3,3}$ are all 1 since the corresponding items were either recalled or created at those times.

To order the activation levels by magnitude:

1. Calculate the normal distribution for each time using the given mean and standard deviation.
2. Add up the weighted recall events for each item.
3. Compare the resulting activation levels to determine the order.

Note that without specific values for $\beta$, $t$, or $d$, we cannot provide numerical results, but the relative magnitudes of the activations will depend on the overlap between the normal distributions corresponding to different recall times.





****************************************************************************************
****************************************************************************************




