Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in tool learning. In real-world scenarios, user queries are often ambiguous and incomplete, requiring effective clarification. However, existing interactive clarification approaches face two critical limitations: reliance on manually constructed datasets, which inherently constrains training data scale and diversity, and lack of error correction mechanisms during multi-turn clarification, leading to error accumulation that compromises both accuracy and efficiency. We present AskToAct, which addresses these challenges by exploiting the structural mapping between queries and their tool invocation solutions. Our key insight is that tool parameters naturally represent explicit user intents. By systematically removing key parameters from queries while retaining them as ground truth, we enable automated construction of high-quality training data. We further enhance model robustness through error-correction pairs and selective masking, enabling dynamic error detection during clarification interactions. Comprehensive experiments demonstrate that AskToAct significantly outperforms existing approaches, achieving above 57% accuracy in recovering critical unspecified intents and enhancing clarification efficiency by an average of 10.46% while maintaining high accuracy in tool invocation. Our framework exhibits robust performance across different model architectures and successfully generalizes to entirely unseen APIs without additional training, achieving performance comparable to GPT-4o with substantially fewer computational resources.

Humans continually engage in reasoning about others’ mental states, a capability known as Theory of Mind (ToM), is essential for social interactions. While this social reasoning capability emerges naturally in human cognitive development, how has the social reasoning capability of Large Language Models (LLMs) evolved during their development process? Various datasets have been proposed to assess LLMs’ social reasoning capabilities, but each is designed with a distinct focus, and none have explored how models’ social reasoning capabilities evolve during model size scaling or reasoning tokens scaling. In light of this, we optimize the evaluation of LLMs’ social reasoning from both data and model perspectives, constructing progressively difficult levels of social reasoning data and systematically exploring how LLMs’ social reasoning capabilities evolve. Furthermore, through an in-depth analysis of DeepSeek-R1’s reasoning trajectories, we identify notable cognitive “Aha Moment” and the reasons for its reasoning errors. Experiments reveal that long-thought logical capabilities and cognitive thinking are key to scaling LLMs’ social reasoning capabilities. By equipping the Qwen2.5-32B-Instruct model with long-thought logical capabilities and cognitive thinking, we achieve an improvement of 19.0 points, attaining social reasoning performance comparable to o1-preview model.

Long-form outline generation for expository articles requires both comprehensive knowledge coverage and logical coherence, which is essential for creating detailed Wikipedia-like content. However, existing methods face critical limitations: outlines generated in the pre-writing stage often have low knowledge density and lack detail, while retrieval-augmented approaches struggle to maintain logical coherence across retrieved information. Additionally, unlike human writers who can iteratively improve through peer feedback and reference similar topics, current approaches lack effective mechanisms for systematic outline refinement. To address these challenges, we propose Logic, a Long-form Outline Generation system via Imitative and Critical self-refinement that mimics human writers’ refinement process. Logic establishes a coherent planning framework and structured knowledge base, learns from similar topic outlines through imitation, and continuously improves through model-based critique. Experiments on FreshWiki and our dataset WikiOutline show that, compared to the best baseline, Logic’s long-form outlines are more organized (with increases of 22.85% and 21.65% respectively) and more logically coherent (with increases of 16.19% and 12.24% respectively). Human evaluation further validates Logic’s effectiveness in generating comprehensive and well-structured long-form outlines.