The increasing size and complexity of large language models (LLMs) raise concerns about their ability to “cheat” on standard Question Answering (QA) benchmarks by memorizing task-specific data. This undermines the validity of benchmark evaluations, as they no longer reflect genuine model capabilities but instead the effects of data leakage. While existing methods detect such leakage, they fail to address the long-term challenge of mitigating it. In this paper, we introduce LastingBench, a novel approach to reinforce and safeguard existing benchmarks against knowledge leakage. Our method involves identifying leakage points through perturbation-based detection, followed by counterfactual rewriting to disrupt memorization while preserving the benchmark’s original evaluative intent. We demonstrate that our approach significantly reduces memorization effects in long-context QA benchmarks, providing a more accurate assessment of model reasoning and generalization abilities. Our experiments show that LastingBench not only uncovers substantial leakage in benchmarks like HotpotQA but also yields a more reliable evaluation of state-of-the-art models, ensuring that benchmarks remain effective and resilient over time.