Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly applied to finance, yet challenges remain in aligning their capabilities with real-world institutional demands. In this survey, we provide a systematic, dual-perspective review bridging financial practice and LLM research. From a practitioner-centric standpoint, we introduce a functional taxonomy covering five core financial domains—Data Analysis, Investment Research, Trading, Investment Management, and Risk Management—mapping each to representative tasks, datasets, and institutional constraints. From a research-focused perspective, we analyze key modeling challenges, including numerical reasoning limitations, prompt sensitivity, and lack of real-time adaptability. We comprehensively catalog over 30 financial benchmarks and 20 representative models, and compare them across modalities, tasks, and deployment limitations. Finally, we identify open challenges and outline emerging directions such as continual adaptation, coordination-aware multi-agent systems, and privacy-compliant deployment. We emphasize deeper researcher–practitioner collaboration and transparent model architectures as critical pathways to safer and more scalable AI adoption in finance.

The electric vehicle (EV) battery supply chain’s vulnerability to disruptions necessitates advanced predictive analytics. We present SHIELD (Schema-based Hierarchical Induction for EV supply chain Disruption), a system integrating Large Language Models (LLMs) with domain expertise for EV battery supply chain risk assessment. SHIELD combines: (1) LLM-driven schema learning to construct a comprehensive knowledge library, (2) a disruption analysis system utilizing fine-tuned language models for event extraction, multi-dimensional similarity matching for schema matching, and Graph Convolutional Networks (GCNs) with logical constraints for prediction, and (3) an interactive interface for visualizing results and incorporating expert feedback to enhance decision-making. Evaluated on 12,070 paragraphs from 365 sources (2022-2023), SHIELD outperforms baseline GCNs and LLM+prompt methods (e.g. GPT-4o) in disruption prediction. These results demonstrate SHIELD’s effectiveness in combining LLM capabilities with domain expertise for enhanced supply chain risk assessment.