Political campaigns increasingly rely on targeted strategies to influence voters on social media. Often, such campaigns have been studied by analysing coordinated behaviour to identify communities of users who exhibit similar patterns. While these analyses are typically conducted on static networks, recent extensions to temporal networks allow tracking users who change communities over time, opening new opportunities to quantitatively study influence in social networks. As a first step toward this goal, we analyse the messages users were exposed to during the UK 2019 election, comparing those received by users who shifted communities with others covering the same topics.Our findings reveal 54 statistically significant linguistic differences and show that a subset of persuasion techniques, including loaded language, exaggeration and minimization, doubt, and flag-waving, are particularly relevant to users’ shifts. This work underscores the importance of analysing coordination from a temporal and dynamic perspective to infer the drivers of users’ shifts in online debate.

Recent years have witnessed the proliferation of offensive content online such as fake news, propaganda, misinformation, and disinformation. While initially this was mostly about textual content, over time images and videos gained popularity, as they are much easier to consume, attract more attention, and spread further than text. As a result, researchers started leveraging different modalities and combinations thereof to tackle online multimodal offensive content. In this study, we offer a survey on the state-of-the-art on multimodal disinformation detection covering various combinations of modalities: text, images, speech, video, social media network structure, and temporal information. Moreover, while some studies focused on factuality, others investigated how harmful the content is. While these two components in the definition of disinformation – (i) factuality, and (ii) harmfulness –, are equally important, they are typically studied in isolation. Thus, we argue for the need to tackle disinformation detection by taking into account multiple modalities as well as both factuality and harmfulness, in the same framework. Finally, we discuss current challenges and future research directions.