Large language models have significantly enhanced the capacities and efficiency of text generation. On the one hand, they have improved the quality of text-based *steganography*. On the other hand, they have also underscored the importance of *watermarking* as a safeguard against malicious misuse. In this study, we focus on tokenization inconsistency (TI) between Alice and Bob in steganography and watermarking, where TI can undermine robustness. Our investigation reveals that the problematic tokens responsible for TI exhibit two key characteristics: **infrequency** and **temporariness**. Based on these findings, we propose two tailored solutions for TI elimination: *a stepwise verification* method for steganography and *a post-hoc rollback* method for watermarking. Experiments show that (1) compared to traditional disambiguation methods in steganography, directly addressing TI leads to improvements in fluency, imperceptibility, and anti-steganalysis capacity; (2) for watermarking, addressing TI enhances detectability and robustness against attacks.