English, as a very high-resource language, enables the pretraining of high-quality large language models (LLMs). However, the same can not be said for most other languages, likely due to a gap in the quality and diversity of available multilingual pretraining corpora. In this work, we find that documents machine-translated from a high-quality English corpus, can contribute significantly to the pretraining quality of multilingual LLMs. Concretely, we translate FineWeb-Edu, a high-quality English web corpus, into nine languages. resulting in a 1.7-trillion-token corpus, which we call TransWebEdu and pretrain a 1.3B-parameter model, TransWebLLM, from scratch on this corpus. Across Non-English understanding and reasoning tasks, we show that TransWebLLM matches or even outperforms multilingual LLMs of similar size, including Llama3.2, Qwen2.5, and Gemma3, despite being trained on an order of magnitude less data. Moreover, we show that adding fewer than 5% of TransWebLLM’s training tokens as domain-specific data for continued pretraining yields state-of-the-art results in Arabic, Indonesian, Swahili, and Welsh for understanding and commonsense reasoning tasks. To promote reproducibility, we release our corpus and models under Open Source Initiative-approved licenses.

As machine translation systems approach human-level quality, traditional evaluation methodologies struggle to detect subtle translation errors. We critically examine limitations in current gold-standard approaches (MQM and ESA), including inconsistencies from variable annotator expertise, excessive categorization complexity, coarse severity granularity, accuracy bias over fluency, and time constraints. To address this issue, we introduce a high-quality dataset consisting of human evaluations for English–Russian translations from WMT24, created by professional linguists. We show that expert assessments without time pressure yield substantially different results from standard evaluations. To enable consistent and rich annotation by these experts, we developed the RATE (Refined Assessment for Translation Evaluation) protocol. RATE provides a streamlined error taxonomy, expanded severity ratings, and multidimensional scoring balancing accuracy and fluency, facilitating deeper analysis of MT outputs. Our analysis, powered by this expert dataset, reveals that state-of-the-art MT systems may have surpassed human translations in accuracy while still lagging in fluency – a critical distinction obscured by existing accuracy-biased metrics. Our findings highlight that advancing MT evaluation requires not only better protocols but crucially, high-quality annotations from skilled linguists.

Linguistic acceptability (LA) attracts the attention of the research community due to its many uses, such as testing the grammatical knowledge of language models and filtering implausible texts with acceptability classifiers.However, the application scope of LA in languages other than English is limited due to the lack of high-quality resources.To this end, we introduce the Russian Corpus of Linguistic Acceptability (RuCoLA), built from the ground up under the well-established binary LA approach. RuCoLA consists of 9.8k in-domain sentences from linguistic publications and 3.6k out-of-domain sentences produced by generative models. The out-of-domain set is created to facilitate the practical use of acceptability for improving language generation.Our paper describes the data collection protocol and presents a fine-grained analysis of acceptability classification experiments with a range of baseline approaches.In particular, we demonstrate that the most widely used language models still fall behind humans by a large margin, especially when detecting morphological and semantic errors. We release RuCoLA, the code of experiments, and a public leaderboard to assess the linguistic competence of language models for Russian.

It has become a de-facto standard to represent words as elements of a vector space (word2vec, GloVe). While this approach is convenient, it is unnatural for language: words form a graph with a latent hierarchical structure, and this structure has to be revealed and encoded by word embeddings. We introduce GraphGlove: unsupervised graph word representations which are learned end-to-end. In our setting, each word is a node in a weighted graph and the distance between words is the shortest path distance between the corresponding nodes. We adopt a recent method learning a representation of data in the form of a differentiable weighted graph and use it to modify the GloVe training algorithm. We show that our graph-based representations substantially outperform vector-based methods on word similarity and analogy tasks. Our analysis reveals that the structure of the learned graphs is hierarchical and similar to that of WordNet, the geometry is highly non-trivial and contains subgraphs with different local topology.