In-context learning (ICL) performance heavily relies on the quality and ordering of demonstrations. Iterative selection (IS) is a promising approach to address this issue, but existing IS methods face two key challenges: the oversimplification of process reward signals that guide intermediate steps (often using single-dimensional metrics) and the lack of outcome reward signals that directly optimize final-task accuracy (relying solely on binary terminal feedback like correct/incorrect predictions). To address these issues, we propose a reinforcement learning method R-Mix which models iterative demonstration selection as a Markov Decision Process (MDP), crafting hybrid reward signals — combining outcome-based accuracy signals (i.e., outcome rewards) with process-oriented signals (i.e, process rewards) like stepwise influence and label entropy improvement. Our analysis reveals a positive but trade-off relationship between outcome rewards and process rewards, underscoring the importance of both components for effective policy optimization. We further introduce a dual-head policy architecture that explicitly decouples input-semantic relevance and label-content compatibility. Experiments across NLP benchmarks demonstrate superior performance over state-of-the-art methods, with ablation studies validating the necessity of both reward components and architectural disentanglement. Our work has deeply explored the effective potential of ICL through demonstration selection.

In-Context Learning (ICL) is an essential emergent ability of Large Language Models (LLMs), and recent studies introduce CoT to exemplars of ICL to enhance the reasoning capability, especially in mathematics tasks. However, given the continuous advancement of model capabilities, it remains unclear whether CoT exemplars still benefit recent, stronger models in such tasks. Through systematic experiments, we find that for recent strong models such as the Qwen2.5 series, adding traditional CoT exemplars does not improve reasoning performance compared to Zero-Shot CoT. Instead, their primary function is to align the output format with human expectations. We further investigate the effectiveness of enhanced CoT exemplars, constructed using answers from advanced models such as Qwen2.5-Max and DeepSeek-R1. Experimental results indicate that these enhanced exemplars still fail to improve the model’s reasoning performance. Further analysis reveals that models tend to ignore the exemplars and focus primarily on the instructions, leading to no observable gain in reasoning ability. Overall, our findings highlight the limitations of the current ICL+CoT framework in mathematical reasoning, calling for a re-examination of the ICL paradigm and the definition of exemplars.