Long-context extension seeks to expand the contextual window in pre-trained large language models (LLMs), allowing them to handle several multiples of their original training context lengths. The primary method for extending the window length involves expanding the initial positional encodings, such as interpolating and extrapolation new positions based on Rotary Position Embedding (RoPE). This expansion inevitably disrupts the positional encodings learned during pre-training, thereby affecting the attention allotment and introducing unseen positional encoding distributions. To address this issue, we propose a new extension strategy based on RoPE, namely Periodic Extrapolation Positional Encodings (PEPE). This strategy expands pre-trained high dimensional components of positional encodings by replicating them in a periodic manner, thereby neither altering the learned positional encoding spaces nor introducing new positional encoding distributions. Experiments demonstrate that PEPE-based approaches can significantly improve long-context extension capabilities using just one-fourth the fine-tuning steps required by state-of-the-art methods. In addition, we analyze the characteristics of PEPE based methods and the key parameters that contribute to their effectiveness. The code is publicly available.

Natural language inference (NLI) is a task to infer the relationship between a premise and a hypothesis (e.g., entailment, neutral, or contradiction), and transformer-based models perform well on current NLI datasets such as MNLI and SNLI. Nevertheless, given the linguistic complexity of the large-scale datasets, it remains controversial whether these models can truly infer the relationship between sentences or they simply guess the answer via shallow heuristics. Here, we introduce a controlled evaluation set called Simple Pair to test the basic sentence inference ability of NLI models using sentences with syntactically simple structures. Three popular transformer-based models, i.e., BERT, RoBERTa, and DeBERTa, are employed. We find that these models fine-tuned on MNLI or SNLI perform very poorly on Simple Pair (< 35.4% accuracy). Further analyses reveal event coreference and compositional binding problems in these models. To improve the model performance, we augment the training set, i.e., MNLI or SNLI, with a few examples constructed based on Simple Pair ( 1% of the size of the original SNLI/MNLI training sets). Models fine-tuned on the augmented training set maintain high performance on MNLI/SNLI and perform very well on Simple Pair (~100% accuracy). Furthermore, the positive performance of the augmented training models can transfer to more complex examples constructed based on sentences from MNLI and SNLI. Taken together, the current work shows that (1) models achieving high accuracy on mainstream large-scale datasets still lack the capacity to draw accurate inferences on simple sentences, and (2) augmenting mainstream datasets with a small number of target simple sentences can effectively improve model performance.