With the continuous advancement in the performance of open-source large language models (LLMs), their inference services have attracted a substantial user base by offering quality comparable to closed-source models at a significantly lower cost. However, it has also given rise to trust issues regarding model consistency between users and third-party service providers. Specifically, service providers can effortlessly degrade a model’s parameter scale or precision for more margin profits, and although users may perceptibly experience differences in text quality, they often lack a reliable method for concrete monitoring. To address this problem, we propose a paradigm for model consistency monitoring on the user side. It constructs metrics based on the logits produced by LLMs to differentiate sequences generated by degraded models. Furthermore, by leveraging model offloading techniques, we demonstrate that the proposed method is implementable on consumer-grade devices. Metric evaluations conducted on three widely used LLMs series (OPT, Llama 3.1 and Qwen 2.5) along with system prototype efficiency tests on a consumer device (RTX 3080 TI) confirm both the effectiveness and feasibility of the proposed approach.

Large language models (LLMs) encapsulate vast amounts of knowledge but still remain vulnerable to external misinformation. Existing research mainly studied this susceptibility behavior in a single-turn setting. However, belief can change during a multi-turn conversation, especially a persuasive one. Therefore, in this study, we delve into LLMs’ susceptibility to persuasive conversations, particularly on factual questions that they can answer correctly. We first curate the Farm (i.e., Fact to Misinform) dataset, which contains factual questions paired with systematically generated persuasive misinformation. Then, we develop a testing framework to track LLMs’ belief changes in a persuasive dialogue. Through extensive experiments, we find that LLMs’ correct beliefs on factual knowledge can be easily manipulated by various persuasive strategies.

“This paper introduces a novel crowdsourcing worker selection algorithm, enhancing annotationquality and reducing costs. Unlike previous studies targeting simpler tasks, this study con-tends with the complexities of label interdependencies in sequence labeling. The proposedalgorithm utilizes a Combinatorial Multi-Armed Bandit (CMAB) approach for worker selec-tion, and a cost-effective human feedback mechanism. The challenge of dealing with imbal-anced and small-scale datasets, which hinders offline simulation of worker selection, is tack-led using an innovative data augmentation method termed shifting, expanding, and shrink-ing (SES). Rigorous testing on CoNLL 2003 NER and Chinese OEI datasets showcased thealgorithm’s efficiency, with an increase in F1 score up to 100.04% of the expert-only base-line, alongside cost savings up to 65.97%. The paper also encompasses a dataset-independenttest emulating annotation evaluation through a Bernoulli distribution, which still led to animpressive 97.56% F1 score of the expert baseline and 59.88% cost savings. Furthermore,our approach can be seamlessly integrated into Reinforcement Learning from Human Feed-back (RLHF) systems, offering a cost-effective solution for obtaining human feedback. All re-sources, including source code and datasets, are available to the broader research community athttps://github.com/blcuicall/nlp-crowdsourcing.”