Timothy Havens
2023
Identification of Dialect for Eastern and Southwestern Ojibwe Words Using a Small Corpus
Kalvin Hartwig
|
Evan Lucas
|
Timothy Havens
Proceedings of the Workshop on Natural Language Processing for Indigenous Languages of the Americas (AmericasNLP)
The Ojibwe language has several dialects that vary to some degree in both spoken and written form. We present a method of using support vector machines to classify two different dialects (Eastern and Southwestern Ojibwe) using a very small corpus of text. Classification accuracy at the sentence level is 90% across a five-fold cross validation and 72% when the sentence-trained model is applied to a data set of individual words. Our code and the word level data set are released openly on Github at [link to be inserted for final version, working demonstration notebook uploaded with paper].
GPTs Don’t Keep Secrets: Searching for Backdoor Watermark Triggers in Autoregressive Language Models
Evan Lucas
|
Timothy Havens
Proceedings of the 3rd Workshop on Trustworthy Natural Language Processing (TrustNLP 2023)
This work analyzes backdoor watermarks in an autoregressive transformer fine-tuned to perform a generative sequence-to-sequence task, specifically summarization. We propose and demonstrate an attack to identify trigger words or phrases by analyzing open ended generations from autoregressive models that have backdoor watermarks inserted. It is shown in our work that triggers based on random common words are easier to identify than those based on single, rare tokens. The attack proposed is easy to implement and only requires access to the model weights. Code used to create the backdoor watermarked models and analyze their outputs is shared at [github link to be inserted for camera ready version].
A Reference-free Segmentation Quality Index (SegReFree)
Evan Lucas
|
Dylan Kangas
|
Timothy Havens
Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2023
Topic segmentation, in the context of natural language processing, is the process of finding boundaries in a sequence of sentences that separate groups of adjacent sentences at shifts in semantic meaning. Currently, assessing the quality of a segmentation is done by comparing segmentation boundaries selected by a human or algorithm to those selected by a known good reference. This means that it is not possible to quantify the quality of a segmentation without a human annotator, which can be costly and time consuming. This work seeks to improve assessment of segmentation by proposing a reference-free segmentation quality index (SegReFree). The metric takes advantage of the fact that segmentation at a sentence level generally seeks to identify segment boundaries at semantic boundaries within the text. The proposed metric uses a modified cluster validity metric with semantic embeddings of the sentences to determine the quality of the segmentation. Multiple segmentation data sets are used to compare our proposed metric with existing reference-based segmentation metrics by progressively degrading the reference segmentation while computing all possible metrics; through this process, a strong correlation with existing segmentation metrics is shown. A Python library implementing the metric is released under the GNU General Public License and the repository is available at https://github.com/evan-person/reference_free_segmentation_metric.
Search