Effectively selecting data from subgroups where a model performs poorly is crucial for improving its performance. Traditional methods for identifying these subgroups often rely on sensitive information, raising privacy issues. Additionally, gathering such information at runtime might be impractical. This paper introduces a cost-effective strategy that addresses these concerns. We identify underperforming subgroups and train a model to predict if an utterance belongs to these subgroups without needing sensitive information. This model helps mitigate bias by selecting and adding new data, which is labeled as challenging, for re-training the speech model. Experimental results on intent classification and automatic speech recognition tasks show the effectiveness of our approach in reducing biases and enhancing performance, with improvements in reducing error rates of up to 39% for FSC, 16% for ITALIC, and 22% for LibriSpeech.

Video summarization aims to generate a condensed textual version of an original video. Summaries may consist of either plain text or a shortlist of salient events, possibly including temporal or spatial references. Video Large Language Models (VLLMs) exhibit impressive zero-shot capabilities in video analysis. However, their performance varies significantly according to the LLM prompt, the characteristics of the video, and the properties of the training data and LLM architecture.In this work, we thoroughly evaluate the zero-shot summarization performance of four state-of-the-art open-source VLLMs specifically designed to address spatial and temporal reasoning. In light of the detected summarization issues, we propose different cost-effective mitigation strategies, based on Chain-of-Thought prompting, that involve the injection of knowledge extracted by external, lightweight models. To perform the VLLM evaluation, we design a new video summarization benchmark consisting of 100 videos with varying characteristics in terms of domain, duration, and spatio-temporal properties. Videos are manually annotated by three independent human experts with plain text, event-based, and spatio-temporal summaries. The experimental evaluation shows that VLLMs significantly benefit from prompting a list of recognized actions, whereas injecting automatically recognized objects and scene changes respectively improve spatially contextualized and event-based summaries in specific cases.