ClimateEval is a comprehensive benchmark designed to evaluate natural language processing models across a broad range of tasks related to climate change. ClimateEval aggregates existing datasets along with a newly developed news classification dataset, created specifically for this release. This results in a benchmark of 25 tasks based on 13 datasets, covering key aspects of climate discourse, including text classification, question answering, and information extraction. Our benchmark provides a standardized evaluation suite for systematically assessing the performance of large language models (LLMs) on these tasks. Additionally, we conduct an extensive evaluation of open-source LLMs (ranging from 2B to 70B parameters) in both zero-shot and few-shot settings, analyzing their strengths and limitations in the domain of climate change.

This introduces SweSAT-1.0, a new benchmark dataset created from the Swedish university entrance exam (Högskoleprovet) to assess large language models in Swedish. The current version of the benchmark includes 867 questions across six different tasks, including reading comprehension, mathematical problem solving, and logical reasoning. We find that some widely used open-source and commercial models excel in verbal tasks, but we also see that all models, even the commercial ones, struggle with reasoning tasks in Swedish. We hope that SweSAT-1.0 will facilitate research on large language models for Swedish by enriching the breadth of available tasks, offering a challenging evaluation benchmark that is free from any translation biases.

To better understand how extreme climate events impact society, we need to increase the availability of accurate and comprehensive information about these impacts. We propose a method for building large-scale databases of climate extreme impacts from online textual sources, using LLMs for information extraction in combination with more traditional NLP techniques to improve accuracy and consistency. We evaluate the method against a small benchmark database created by human experts and find that extraction accuracy varies for different types of information. We compare three different LLMs and find that, while the commercial GPT-4 model gives the best performance overall, the open-source models Mistral and Mixtral are competitive for some types of information.