The evaluation of text generated by LLMs remains a challenge for question answering, retrieval augmented generation (RAG), summarization, and many other natural language processing tasks. Evaluating the factuality of LLM generated responses is particularly important in medical question answering, where the stakes are high. One method of evaluating the factuality of text is through the use of information nuggets (answer keys). Nuggets are text representing atomic facts that may be used by an assessor to make a binary decision as to whether the fact represented by said nugget is contained in an answer. Although manual nugget extraction is expensive and time-consuming, recent RAG shared task evaluations have explored automating the nuggetization of text with LLMs. In this work, we explore several approaches to nugget generation for medical question answering and evaluate their alignment with expert human nugget generation. We find providing an example and extracting nuggets from an answer to be the best approach to nuggetization. While, overall, we found the capabilities of LLMs to distill atomic facts limited, Llama 3.3 performed the best out of the models we tested.

In this paper, we present an overview of CLINIQLINK a shared task, collocated with the 24th BioNLP workshop at ACL 2025, designed to stress-test large language models (LLMs) on medically-oriented question answering aimed at the level of a General Practitioner. The challenge supplies 4 978 expert-verified, medical source-grounded question–answer pairs that cover seven formats - true/false, multiple choice, unordered list, short answer, short-inverse, multi-hop, and multi-hop-inverse. Participating systems, bundled in Docker or Apptainer images, are executed on the CodaBench platform or the University of Maryland’s Zaratan cluster. An automated harness (Task 1) scores closed-ended items by exact match and open-ended items with a three-tier embedding metric. A subsequent physician panel (Task 2) audits the top model responses.