Katrine Baunvig
2025
Why Novels (Don’t) Break Through: Dynamics of Canonicity in the Danish Modern Breakthrough (1870-1900)
Alie Lassche
|
Pascale Feldkamp
|
Yuri Bizzoni
|
Katrine Baunvig
|
Kristoffer Nielbo
Proceedings of the 9th Joint SIGHUM Workshop on Computational Linguistics for Cultural Heritage, Social Sciences, Humanities and Literature (LaTeCH-CLfL 2025)
Recent studies suggest that canonical works possess unique textual profiles, often tied to innovation and higher cognitive demands. However, recent work on Danish 19th century literary novels has shown that some non-canonical works shared similar textual qualities with canonical works, underscoring the role of text-extrinsic factors in shaping canonicity. The present study examines the same corpus (more than 800 Danish novels from the Modern Breakthrough era (1870–1900)) to explore socio-economic and institutional factors, as well as demographic features, specifically, book prices, publishers, and the author’s nationality – in determining canonical status. We combine expert-based and national definitions of canon to set up a classification experiment to test the predictive power of these external features, and to understand how they relate to that of text-intrinsic features. We show that the canonization process is influenced by external factors – such as publisher and nationality – but that text-intrinsic features nevertheless maintain predictive power in a dynamic interplay of text and context.
2024
Canonical Status and Literary Influence: A Comparative Study of Danish Novels from the Modern Breakthrough (1870–1900)
Pascale Feldkamp
|
Alie Lassche
|
Jan Kostkan
|
Márton Kardos
|
Kenneth Enevoldsen
|
Katrine Baunvig
|
Kristoffer Nielbo
Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Natural Language Processing for Digital Humanities
We examine the relationship between the canonization of Danish novels and their textual innovation and influence, taking the Danish Modern Breakthrough era (1870–1900) as a case study. We evaluate whether canonical novels introduced a significant textual novelty in their time, and explore their influence on the overall literary trend of the period. By analyzing the positions of canonical versus non-canonical novels in semantic space, we seek to better understand the link between a novel’s canonical status and its literary impact. Additionally, we examine the overall diversification of Modern Breakthrough novels during this significant period of rising literary readership. We find that canonical novels stand out from both the historical novel genre and non-canonical novels of the period. Our findings on diversification within and across groups indicate that the novels now regarded as canonical served as literary trendsetters of their time.
Search
Fix data
Co-authors
- Pascale Feldkamp 2
- Alie Lassche 2
- Kristoffer Nielbo 2
- Yuri Bizzoni 1
- Kenneth Enevoldsen 1
- show all...